why can the indian casinos block pokerstars

Since then, Delaware, Nevada and New Jersey have provided legal pathways for gaming sites.

“Regrettably, if these amendments are not accepted, we must continue to strongly oppose further movement of AB 2863.” “We wish to acknowledge your work to make progress on a contentious issue,” the tribes wrote in a joint June 29 letter to Gray. They promised to block it unless penalties are toughened against those poker businesses that operated illegally after the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act was passed in 2006.

The Barona Band of Mission Indians outside San Diego and the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians in Palm Springs also oppose the legislation. The seven tribes still opposing the deal include the owners of the Pechanga Resort & Casino in Temecula, the state’s largest Indian casino. A deal that would allow Californians to play legal online poker games for cash has gained powerful support for the first time ever, but significant hurdles remain.Īssembly Bill 2863 has the backing of the state’s biggest card clubs and some of its largest Indian casinos, surpassing any other statewide effort since the federal government opened the door to legal internet gambling five years ago.Īdditionally, for the first time, the horse-racing industry has agreed to stay out of the online gambling business in return for an annual $60 million stipend.īut, more than a year into negotiations, a powerful coalition of casino-owning American Indian tribes announced last week that it will not support the proposed law by Assemblyman Adam Gray, D-Merced, without further concessions.

Why can the indian casinos block pokerstars